Jev.aitools.fyi

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mapika decider as a Jev alternative

Last verified: .How we rank

Mapika/decider ships Apache 2.0 code and multiple Hugging Face checkpoints from 2B dense to 35B-A3b MoE. README states no affiliation with TypeSafe and no distillation from hosted Jev. decider.serve and decider.serve_vllm expose POST /v1/systemone.

Standing sections quote JevBench and Decision Index rows as vendor-read leaderboard snapshots. Independent Decision Index scores for decider-2B are lower than Jev in our import, so evaluate on your data before you replace production gates.

jev.aitools.fyi is an independent directory. We are not TypeSafe, Cloudflare, OpenAI, Perplexity, or the makers named on this page unless a listing is marked official.

Catalog listing: decider (brand-focused page; this article is the Jev comparison).

Mapika decider vs Jev at a glance

TopicMapika deciderTypeSafe JevSource
MakerMapikaTypeSafe AIGitHub: Mapika/decider
First public release2025 public GitHub and PyPI decider-aiHosted System One (ongoing)GitHub: Mapika/decider
License / accessApache 2.0Hosted API (weights not downloadable)decider README
Hosted price (input)not published$0.042 per M input tokens (vendor list, 2026-10-12)TypeSafe models page (jev-1.13.0 price table)
API shapePOST /v1/systemone via decider.servePOST /v1/systemonedecider.serve docs; Jev: TypeSafe API reference
Question typesChoice, Score, NoulChoice, Score, Nouldecider.serve docs
InputsJSON state and questions mapStructured state stringdecider.serve docs
Model sizes0.8B through 35B-A3b plus vision variantsHosted Jev (closed)Hugging Face: decider-2b
Latencynot publishednot publishedGitHub: Mapika/decider (no published p95 SLA cited)
Decision Index (public)25.8 (Decision Index 0.3.1, snapshot 2026-10-10; independent harness, not vendor-only)60.11 (Decision Index 0.3.1, snapshot 2026-10-10; independent harness, not vendor-only)Decision Index 0.3.1 public snapshot
Data handlingnot publishedProcessed under TypeSafe termsSelf-hosted data handling not published on a single vendor page
SDKsTypeSafe SDK with base URL swap; pip install decider-aitypesafe_sdk, gateways, MCP ecosystemdecider.serve docs
Adoption signal1,127 GitHub stars (2026-10-12); 331,532 HF downloads (2026-10-12)not publishedGitHub repository (stars) · Hugging Face model card (downloads)

What decider is

Mapika/decider ships Apache 2.0 code and multiple Hugging Face checkpoints from 2B dense to 35B-A3b MoE. README states no affiliation with TypeSafe and no distillation from hosted Jev. decider.serve and decider.serve_vllm expose POST /v1/systemone.

Standing sections quote JevBench and Decision Index rows as vendor-read leaderboard snapshots. Independent Decision Index scores for decider-2B are lower than Jev in our import, so evaluate on your data before you replace production gates.

Accuracy and benchmarks

Independent Decision Index edition 0.3.1 lists Mapika decider at 25.8 in our imported snapshot.

Fit and tradeoffs

Choose decider when your constraints match its deployment model: You want Qwen 3.5 trained decider weights with public mixture.py; You need vLLM serve for throughput on your cluster; You prefer an independent lineage from Jared Palmer Kev.

Pricing and ops

decider checkpoints range from 2B dense to 35B MoE; size GPUs from the HF card for the variant you pin, not from a smaller demo model.

Migrating from hosted Jev

Keep your question map and threshold logic stable. Swap client configuration to point at the new base URL or SDK, then run shadow traffic until disagreement rates fall below your risk budget.

                // Before: hosted Jev
const client = new TypeSafe({ apiKey: process.env.TYPESAFE_API_KEY });
await client.systemone({ model: "jev-latest", state, questions });

// After: self-hosted System One compatible server (Kev, decider, SemIf, etc.)
const client = new TypeSafe({ baseURL: "http://localhost:8000" });
await client.systemone({ model: "decider-2b", state, questions });
              

Ecosystem links

Mapika/decider README plus decider.serve docs pair with HF checkpoint cards for each size you evaluate.

Product-specific notes

decider.serve_vllm is the path when you already operate vLLM fleets; decider.serve is lighter for a single-node proof of concept. MoE checkpoints change memory footprints non-linearly; read the HF card for the exact variant before you size GPUs.

Mapika's README explicitly disclaims distillation from hosted Jev, which matters for procurement questionnaires. Vendor README leaderboard snapshots can disagree with independent Decision Index rows; label charts clearly in internal reviews.

Multiple dense and MoE sizes exist; do not assume decider-2B scores predict 35B-A3b behavior on your labels. HTTP compatibility with POST /v1/systemone helps SDK reuse, but you still own auth, TLS, and rate limits on the server you run.

When to choose Mapika decider

  • You want Qwen 3.5 trained decider weights with public mixture.py
  • You need vLLM serve for throughput on your cluster
  • You prefer an independent lineage from Jared Palmer Kev

When to stay on Jev

  • You do not want to operate calibration CLIs and GPU fleets
  • Hosted Jev already passes your internal eval without retraining
  • You need TypeSafe-supported incident response

FAQ

Is Mapika decider the same product as TypeSafe Jev?

No. Jev is TypeSafe's hosted System One service. Mapika decider is a separate product with its own weights, terms, and ops model unless explicitly documented as compatible HTTP.

Does Mapika decider beat Jev on Decision Index?

The public snapshot in our metrics file scores Mapika decider; compare the facts table to hosted Jev. decider-2B headline scores do not predict MoE checkpoint behavior on your labeled data.

Can I use the TypeSafe SDK with Mapika decider?

Point typesafe_sdk at decider.serve, pin the HF checkpoint name, and verify MoE versus dense response metadata in staging before you cut traffic over.

Should I leave hosted Jev entirely?

Not necessarily. Teams often keep Jev for gates that need vendor support while experimenting with Mapika decider on lower-risk paths. Run shadow mode until metrics prove parity.

Other Jev alternatives

Sources

Last verified . Spotted an error? Contact us.

By Rishit